10/ 📊 Minswap Community members are encouraged to discuss these options, shaping the future of $MINomics. The Proposal was co-authored by @navir333 , @PurritoGeneral , @cardano_farmer and @DojoNilez

9/ 🔥🔥🔥🔥 Option 4: 40% burn or 2,000,000,000 $MIN. Drastically reducing both allocations, and resulting in a circulating supply of 33.98%.

7/ 🔥🔥 Option 2: 20% burn or 1,000,000,000 $MIN, affecting both Yield Farming and Dev Fund, resulting in a circulating supply of 25.48%.

6/ 🚫 Option 1 for Voting: No burn, keeping tokenomics as they are, with farming lasting ~22.8 more years with YF allocation and Dev Fund unchanged. Keeping the same circulating supply of 20.4%.

5/ The proposal is part of a shift towards Sustainable Yield: a Transition from farming dependency to Real Yield from trading fees. With time, the objective is to make $MIN a scarce resource benefitting from trading fees and platform utility.

4/ Burn Mechanics: a one-time significant burn. The $MIN token is to become scarce not only for the community, but also for Minswap Labs. Thus, it is proposed that tokens be burnt from both Yield Farming and the Development Fund (which are part of Minswap Labs tokens)

3/ Proposal for $MIN Burn🔥 Reasons for the Proposal include: addressing low float, adjusting the farming token surplus, and aligning with community sentiment. The main aim is to reflect the maturity of the project and optimize resource allocation, in line with $MINomics V2

2/ $MINomics V2 was introduced to improve $MIN tokenomics, including: 🔵 Redirecting Fee Switch $ADA to $MIN stakers 🔵 Allocating 50% of Batcher Fees to the DAO Treasury 🔵 Cutting down emissions by 46.5% in the last 6 months